Saturday, March 10, 2012

Overblown (Take Shelter)

(Impossible to discuss this movie without giving it away, so be aware there are spoilers.)

Shotgun Stories
, the 2007 drama from writer-director Jeff Nichols, remains one of the most impressive debuts of its decade. The movie, about a blood feud between two sets of rival brothers in rural Arkansas, depicted lower-class Americans without a trace of the condescension which Alexander Payne and Joel and Ethan Coen are always accused of, and which Jason Reitman and Kelly Reichardt actually employ. Shotgun Stories builds in intensity, but its best scenes depict the wit and resourcefulness not uncommon among the economically desperate. Nichols could be accurately called a classical filmmaker, yet he frequently stages sequences that don't play out the way you expect. The peace-loving sibling of the main trio, for example, doesn't suddenly resort to violence in order to prove he's a man. It's a movie made by a director who treats his characters with respect.

Take Shelter (2011), Nichols' follow-up, received a modest yet considerably larger audience as well as even stronger reviews - an impeccably crafted film with a talk-about ending that's given it an element of staying power. It takes nothing away from Nichols' abilities as one of the most promising filmmakers of his generation when I say that I think he misfires badly this time: psychological thriller is not his metier. Take Shelter stars Michael Shannon as Curtis, an Ohio construction worker with a wife and daughter who begins to experience troubling nightmares. The family dog bites him. His daughter is kidnapped. Most of all, the weather turns dark and terrifying in the form of downpours and twisters. His dreams take the form of waking visions when he starts to hear thunderclaps that nobody else hears and sees birds circling in ominous formations that nobody else sees. Convinced that a massive storm is coming - while also considering the off-chance that he's losing his mind - Curtis invests his money and energy into rebuilding the underground tornado shelter on his property, estranging himself from his family and putting his job at risk.

Anything can happen when a skilled filmmaker clashes with the conventions of a genre. (Random good example: Steven Soderbergh's Out of Sight; random bad: Martin Scorsese's Cape Fear.) Take Shelter gives us an Everyman whom Everyone thinks is going crazy, along with a deaf child in need of a medical procedure that requires his healthcare plan, in case our emotions were in need of further goosing. Yet Nichols keeps the other shoe from dropping for so long that I wish he had avoided the inevitable altogether. It's revealed that Curtis's mother (Kathy Baker) is a diagnosed schizophrenic who abandoned him when he was a child, and the possibility that Curtis too may be inflicted by bipolar disorder is treated (at first) seriously and compassionately. Eventually, though, Nichols resorts to the deck-stacking side-stepped by his first film, the kind where most of the protagonist's problems would be avoided by simply telling those around him what's going on. Curtis loses his job as the result of a contrived chain of events involving his co-worker/best friend Dewart (Shea Whigham), culminating in showy fisticuffs at a community dinner where Curtis bugs his eyeballs and screams at everybody that "A STORM'S A-COMIN!", or a jeremiad to that effect, as tables are turned over and silverware goes flying.

Screaming and eyeball-bugging come all too easily to Michael Shannon, whose knack for overacting can be amusing in doses but is frequently hard to take at center-stage. Relatively subdued in Shotgun Stories, Shannon's soft-spokenness in Take Shelter is belied by his own physical tics. We need to see Curtis as a normally functioning human being to care about his decline, and Shannon - like Vince Vaughn in the Psycho remake - looks like he's woken up with flopsweat his entire life. It's not entirely his fault, though. Nichols directs his actor to spend half the movie craning his neck up to the sky, and what he sees (and we see) look like fairly impressive special effects - yet nothing more than CGI. I imagine it will be argued that if Curtis is hallucinating then his hallucinations should have an air of unreality. But I think that circling birds -- like the bats swarming over downtown Austin in Terrence Malick's Tree of Life, an indelible image that looks and feels authentic -- need to appear real if we are to believe that Curtis believes they are real.

Credit Nichols for testing himself, and I hope he doesn't stop trying different things, but it's clear that he isn't playing to his strengths here. His interests in Take Shelter clearly lie in depicting the everyday struggles of characters dealing with crummy jobs and rising gas prices and high pharmaceutical co-pays. He's also highly adept at conveying a loving marriage under siege. As Curtis's wife Samantha, Jessica Chastain, in one of her half-dozen remarkably varied performances from last year, gives to her co-star much more than she gets - but that's right down her wheelhouse as an actress. There seems to be nothing that isn't: Chastain is put through the paces of bewilderment and frustration, anger and fear toward her husband's madness, only to double-down on steely resolve to help him overcome it. Her big moment, in what should have been the film's climax, is both touching and powerful, only to be betrayed by a denouement in which the director ditches his creative integrity. Nichols probably needed the ending he came up with to get the movie made in the first place: What studio wants to greenlight an honest movie about mental illness? And, yes, it's still "open to interpretation" that either the storms in Curtis's head turn out to be real or his wife is now sharing in his insanity. Both options are utter nonsense; though I suppose if you're Terry Gilliam or Randy Quaid (quite a target demographic), one or the other has appeal.

6 comments:

Jason Bellamy said...

I liked this more than you, but find that a lot of your criticisms hit home...

* Yet Nichols keeps the other shoe from dropping for so long that I wish he had avoided the inevitable altogether.

* But I think that circling birds ... need to appear real if we are to believe that Curtis believes they are real.

* What studio wants to greenlight an honest movie about mental illness? And, yes, it's still "open to interpretation" that either the storms in Curtis's head turn out to be real or his wife is now sharing in his insanity. Both options are utter nonsense...

What I like about the ending is that it reminded me of Last Temptation of Christ -- stay with me here -- in that I felt the character I was looking at was completely crazy and, yeah, probably divine/prophetic, too. Which is to say that I like it because it doesn't make sense and can't be explained.

The linchpin of that scene, and the entire movie actually, is Chastain, because she's the credible, oh-so-real character, and her nod gives the storm validity. And yet, without seeing it a second time, is it possible her nod could mean something else, a nod that she recognizes a storm taking over her husband, and that she's going to support him in his moment of fear? Something like that?

The scene that blew me away is the one in the bunker -- a scene that works incredibly well on the big screen (amazingly, silence more than explosiveness, always plays better in a theater, despite what advertisers of blockbusters want us to believe). That segment is masterfully conceived and executed.

Craig said...

Thanks, Jason. I don't think your comparison with "Last Temptation" is daft - in fact, there's a lot to it. The difference, though, is in Scorsese's flick we see Judas and the other disciples witness Jesus's miracles; there's no such independent evidence of Curtis's visions in "Take Shelter." It's all in his head until the end, where it's completely unearned.

(Gotta disagree on Chastain in that final scene; the POV shot makes it clear to me that she sees the storm, and that their daughter sees it too.)

Had a lengthy discussion on Facebook over the weekend with Kevin Olson (who liked the movie) and Ryan Kelly (who didn't), and at one point I commented that if "Take Shelter" had been about Curtis's fears infecting the community, then Nichols may have achieved what he's aspiring to - a glimpse at the world we live in. Instead, he takes the obvious route with everyone thinking Curtis is nuts. The one good thing that comes out of this, as you said, is Chastain's performance (and that bunker scene), which is predicated on loving someone she suspects is losing his mind. The larger picture, though, is flimsy to me, albeit well-crafted enough to tuck around the edges as best as Nichols can.

Jason Bellamy said...

Gotta disagree on Chastain in that final scene; the POV shot makes it clear to me that she sees the storm, and that their daughter sees it too.

Damn. I thought it was a reach. As the scene unfolded I was truly moved by it and also felt my bullshit detector go off at the same time -- later I tried to rationalize that there was some truly ambiguous reading. But other than assuming "it's all a hallucination" (which would be lame), I don't think it's there.

Maybe that explains why I never went back and saw it a second time, despite intending to.

Adam Zanzie said...

I finally got to see this movie, and loved it quite a bit -- it would have easily cracked my Top 5 of the year had I seen it earlier -- but I see where you're coming from. The one thing I can't argue with are your criticisms of that 5-minute coda on the beach at the end, which I still have mixed feelings about. Since I'm such a sentimentalist, I was so ready to burst into tears during that shot of Curtis, Samantha and Hannah embracing under the sunny skies that I could feel myself screaming, YES! END IT HERE! THEN THE MOVIE WILL BE PERFECT! And then... the coda. And then... mixed emotions. Overall, still a great movie, but... bloody hell! That fookin' coda.

I noticed that conversation you and Ryan were having on FB about what the film appears to be saying about our modern times. To be honest, while I was watching this movie, I was never thinking about it in terms of allegory; I saw it more as Nichols' classical variation on movies about disoriented male protagonists in creepy rural settings. Robert Mulligan specialized in stuff like that -- The Stalking Moon, The Other, The Nickel Ride, etc. -- which may partially explain why I so totally dug what Nichols was doing here (and I haven't even seen Shotgun Stories yet). The CGI birds did look a little odd, but I accepted them in the same way I accepted the CGI dinosaurs in The Tree of Life and moved on from there.

Mind you, I'm not suggesting Take Shelter ISN'T allegory, and it very well could be. But I'd say Nichols is actually hitting on some pretty universal themes here. I did have those same thoughts you did about what the movie might have been like had it been more about mental illness instead of trying to make Curtis' hallucinations real, but then again, that would have basically been a low-budget version of Shutter Island, no? What I appreciated is that Nichols makes the ending of the movie unpredictable by giving the audience exactly what it wants at the end of the movie -- a storm -- while still retaining a feeling that Curtis is exaggerating. Yes, there was a storm, but it wasn't a big one, and Curtis' neighbors are all fine. Still, the storm itself is so cathartic that it allows Curtis and Samantha to reach... some form of conclusion. The bar mitzvah sequence which concluded A Serious Man worked in roughly the same way (your mentioning of Terry Gilliam and Randy Quaid at the end of the piece confused me... is it a reference to the more tragic ending of Brazil and to Quaid's recent declarations that he's been paranoid of Hollywood ever since Heath Ledger died?).

As for Shannon, I loved his performance and thought he was just as great as Chastain was, but then again I've always thought he was a wonderful actor to begin with. Here, he's really doing for Curtis what Richard Dreyfuss did for Roy Neary: bringing out the childlike daydreaming, the frustrating naivete and the somewhat-accurate prophetic visions of a simple family man. It's like a combination of the deranged conspiracy theorist Friedkin had him play in Bug and the brutally-honest mathematician Mendes had him play in Revolutionary Road. I can see why Shannon may not be everyone's cup of tea; as you said on FB, he's an acquired taste. But to say he's as bad in this as Vince Vaughn was in Psycho!?? Oh, come now. He can't be *that* much of an acquired taste. And I say that as one who thinks Vince Vaughn is terrible in just about everything.

Craig said...

Thanks for your thoughts, Adam.

I (and Ryan) may have felt more conscious about "Take Shelter" being allegorical because we both saw "Shotgun Stories," and that's a straightforward take on many of the same issues. I think the recurring references to medical bills and gas prices are Nichols' way of rooting his allegory in a very specific here and now (though, yes, it could certainly be universal too).

I wasn't comparing Michael Shannon's acting abilities to Vince Vaughn's. I was saying that they telegraph their craziness: Shannon in "Take Shelter," Vaughn in "Psycho." The whole movie feels telegraphed to me: I kept waiting for Nichols to go a different direction. He waited until the end, and I think it's a cop-out.

The Gilliam/Quaid quip was one of my patented vague attempts at humor. One of Gilliam's themes is crazy people are more sane than sane people. Quaid and his wife now have what's been called a "collective insanity," which is what I thought of when Chastain sees the storm at the end.

Heh, a "low-budget 'Shutter Island.'" Had "Shutter Island" been more low-budget, less overwrought and bloated, I might have liked it better.

Adam Zanzie said...

The Gilliam/Quaid quip was one of my patented vague attempts at humor. One of Gilliam's themes is crazy people are more sane than sane people. Quaid and his wife now have what's been called a "collective insanity," which is what I thought of when Chastain sees the storm at the end.

Ah. Well, looks like I at least kinda, sorta got the Quaid reference! lol